sugarpoet.com

Sunday, January 18, 2004

Gore: Our Answer to a Scorched Earth Policy

MoveOn, my favorite grassroots powerhouse, put together another amazing event, that united MoveOn members and environmental activists, in common cause and a renewed sense of both proactive energy and righteous anger. On this, the coldest day in New York, Al Gore presented his thoughts and a wealth of accumulated evidence demonstrating the catastrophy that is global warming. The entire text of the prepared speech, Global Warming and the Environment, is on the MoveOn site now, as is the webcast.

Al Gore was a truly inspired and passionate speaker. If only he was in touch with his "inner activist" during the campaign, I think there never would have been the Florida question. For a few moments, I felt as if I were at a revival (note these moments were not during the sections filled with scientific jargon; sections that though necessary, were nonetheless painful) - rising to my feet every other phrase, with a barely repressed "Yes, Lord!" or "Testify, Brother Gore!" This is the consequence of a stolen election and four years of unbridled power in the hands of robber barons - radicalization of even the most well-mannered Democrats.

He began the speech with photos of our spectacular planet from the Apollo and Galileo missions - which photos I think set the right tone for this topic. Too often we become mired in a depressive apathy when encountering gloomy or even apocalyptic environmental reports. By beginning with images of the Earth, spinning quietly with the void of space as an inky backdrop, we are reminded that this planet is our home. As we briefly pass through on our journey from birth to death, we are mere stewards for the next generation. Gore quoted the poet, Archibald McLeish, who reacted in rhapsodic fashion to the first image of earth from space:

To see the earth as we now see it, small and beautiful in that eternal silence where it floats, is to see ourselves as riders on the earth together

After the emotional introduction, he followed up with a wry animated clip about global warming, involving a "Mr. Sunbeam" who was accosted and brutalized by a murderous greenhouse gas gang - soon the earth's atmosphere is littered with the "corpses" of Mr. Sunbeam's, creating global warming. After the clip, he went on to show a sort of "before and after" series: Mt. Kilimanjaro before global warming, and a Mt. Kilimanjaro with snows no more; Glacier National Park twenty years ago, and now, where it will need to be renamed "No Glacier National Park;" and so on.

The evidence obtained from drillings in the Arctic and Antarctic ice, the former going back 1,000 years and the latter going back more than 400,000 years, were particularly persuasive. As Gore said, "Glaciers don't care about politics...they just melt and freeze." Charts of tempartures derived from the ice, as well as records of CO2 levels, show a definitive and large jump in higher temperatures and higher CO2 levels during the last few decades. Furthermore, the charts demonstrated a clear correlation between CO2 levels and temperatures. He presented other scientific findings and data during the speech, but I found that these charts are the most convincing.

The remainder of the speech was devoted not only to rehashing Bush's broken campaign promises about the environment, his gutting of the EPA and every clean air, water, and so on, laws on the books, and the unwavering commitment of this administration to the interests of corporate polluters over the health and welfare of our and the globe's citizens. But Gore also exhorted the audience to not just believe, but to act, with the knowledge that without action, our civilization is on a collision course with the dark destiny of environmental collapse. And unlike all the feverish dreams of apocalypse that the barefoot, mad soothsayers of the past proclaimed, the prospect of total planetary ruin rose quietly, rationally from the totality of the evidence put before us.

The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life…Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand…There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we’ve ever known.

Gore's last remark, made about a picture taken from deep in space showing earth to be only a speck of pale light in the cosmos, was, to me, instructive about the state of mind we must share to right ourselves. The principle of humility before the awesome mystery and miracle of nature, and the great promise of human action in the face of grave danger echo that faint religious fervor that bubbled under the surface of the entire speech. In the age of rivers of Starbucks with their straight-to-landfill latte receptacles, forests dense with a network of coal-burning utilities pumping surge after surge to our billion devices, mountains of model subdivisions diverting the last drops of ancient aquifers, and oceans coursing with the latest model Hummers and Range Rovers, we are in need of that old-time religion, for we indeed are facing the perils of our sins. Repent we must.

Tuesday, January 13, 2004

MoveOn Movin' Up

Last night Jason and I attended the Moveon.org "Bush in 30 seconds" Ad Party, and....WOW! I feel sort of at a loss here - normally in my event reviews, I rip the subject event to shreds (even my review of an Anti-Bush Rally last June was harsh). As if I have reversed the age-old commandment, I almost think that since I have only nice things to say, I should say nothing at all. That being said, I will give a rundown of the evening for everyone who could either not be there in person or watch the the Internet broadcast (which sadly has not been archived on the website). And I guess I will, because I can't help myself, be a little critical of the entertainment, but only to imbue my review with a sense of fair-play and balanced evaluation :).

The evening opened with a Jimi Hendrix-style rendition of the anthem on guitar by Vernon Reid - which was cool, if a tad ear-splitting. Margaret Cho came out and delivered some mostly funny leftist bits, though the sound system rendered some jokes inaudible. Interestingly, the stage hands and technicians running the lights and sound for the event were also participating in a union strike outside the theatre (which strike MoveOn supported in one of the opening speeches). I believe at this point Janeane Garofalo came out (sporting a baseball cap making her almost unrecognizable), and introduced the first batch of ads (please pardon my errors in recounting the exact order of events - the program does not contain a listing, and my memory of such things is far from perfect). The enormous screen made the ads seem much more powerful than viewing them on my laptop at 750 mbps had. Rufus Wainwright performed several songs, of which his familiar "Hallelujah" provoked the greatest reaction.

Janeane showed more ads to mounting enthusiasm. At some point around this time, the MoveOn guy, Eli Pariser, who worked with Moby and Laura Dawn to create Bush in 30 Seconds, gave a speech about the genesis of the idea and the significance of the contest. He also said that we had the opportunity to show the winning ad during the Superbowl, which resulted in wildly enthusiastic applause and whistling. Then Chuck D (Public Enemy) did a few numbers, most of which were fairly weak considering he used to be the Angriest Voice in America. Perhaps because he felt he was among friends, his voice, his rap just did not have that pop of yesteryear. Of course, the trio of similarly attired white chicks dancing on the floor in rockette synchronization did not help his street credibility.

After Chuck D's lackluster performance, the alleged prince of the hip-hop realm, Russell Simmons, announced the alternative category of animation nominees. Julia Stiles introduced another category, with a bit about how she had been afraid to appear because she thought that O'Reilly might show up at her house with a shotgun (not entirely paranoid, in my opinion). Al Franken, who received a standing ovation before speaking, made some hilarious jokes, particularly the one he made when he turned to the sign language interpreter and said "Hi, I'm the signer. I heard Al Franken making some jokes about deaf people backstage. Let's kill him after the show" (not verbatim). He then showed another alternative category. The ads for which I voted in humor, If Parents Acted Like Bush, and animation, What I Been Up To, both won. The Youth Market winner, Bring It On, while funny, does not seem particularly youth-centric, but whatever.

Margaret Cho (dressed as a doctor) came on again with another performer and did this lame comedy rap about health care, most of which was completely garbled (again) by the sound system. John Sayles introduced the last set of ads and Moby announced the People's Choice award, which was also the ad I selected, "Child's Pay." I suppose to build suspense (since the judges had already selected a winner), Moby and Laura Dawn performed some amazing covers of "Sweet Child of Mine," "Walk on the Wild Side" and "Creep."

Michael Moore, who also received a standing ovation, announced that "What are We Teaching Our Children" won runner-up and Child's Pay, the People's Choice, had also been selected by the official judges as the overall winner and would be aired after the President's State of the Union Address. The show closed out with "Walk this Way" covered by Moby and Laura Dawn. As the crowd wandered out, I did not feel the inevitable disappointment that infects you after an event of this kind, but some sense of hope (however limited) that something positive is afoot if not for the Oval Office race of 2004, at least for free speech and media coverage of politics. Perhaps the Bush in 30 seconds ad will not change any minds or bring about the kind of flower power revolution the 60's witnessed, but for a moment, I felt like I too had a voice in our nation's affairs, and that is no mean feat.

Wednesday, January 07, 2004

Another Year-End Top Ten: Bush "Misleads"

Since Misleader.org (a project of MoveOn) started putting out the "Daily Mislead," a daily email that exposes some lie or other form of misleadership eminating from the Bush administration, I have become angrier and angrier but feel a little overwhelmed in the face of so much ammunition. After seeing so many trivial and tired year-end "Top Ten" lists (like the Ten Best Stephen King Books Published in 2003 or Ten Most Trampy Outfits of Britney Spears), I decided to write a Top Ten of my own derived from the Misleader archives (I chose not to do a review of all of the President's misdeeds, since it would be difficult for me sift through the thousands of related articles for the entire year and well...I guess I'm lazy).

Top Ten Bush Misleads of 2003 (plus a few days into 2004)

1. Dude, he lied about the uranium.
SOTU Uranium Claim Exposed by Bush Advisory Board (1/5/2004)
Related: Bush Administration Oversold Prewar Intelligence to Justify War in Iraq (11/4/2003)

2. It's like "Where's Waldo," only with Weapons of Mass Distruction.
President Bush's Inspectors Find No Weapons to Support his Claims about Imminent Threat (9/25/2003)
Related: One Year Later, the President's Evidence for Going to War remains Illusory (10/8/2003)
Related: Bush Administration Spends Week Retracting Assertions about Saddam's Threat to the U.S. (9/19/2003)
Related: White House Covers Tracks by Removing Information (12/18/2003)

2. He not only ignored the 9/11 warnings, but covered up his knowledge of the warnings after the fact, all the while blaming the intelligence failure on Clinton - and people say he's stupid!
White House Admits Pre-9/11 Warnings; Bush Still Denies It (12/16/2003)
Related: Prominent Republican Challenges President Bush's Vow to "Uncover Every Detail" of September 11th Attacks (10/27/2003)
Related: Administration Grants Restricted Access to President's Intelligence Briefing (11/17/2003)

3. Despite pretensions of sound fiscal policy, he's the biggest spender of them all. He's like a teenager with his first credit card - who does he think is going to pay for all the crap he bought at the mall?
Bush Action on Fiscal Discipline Doesn't Follow Rhetoric (12/1/2003)
Related: More Presidential Deficit Deceit (12/11/2003)
Related: U. S. Comptroller Declares Bush Policies Will Keep Nation Deeply in Debt (10/10/2003)

4. Bush apparently believes we would be as safe from terrorism as the Saudis if he and Ashcroft could just get rid of those pesky civil liberties, as the Saudi royal family has so kindly done for their subjects.
Bush's Monitoring of Protests Undermines Public Support for Free Speech (11/24/2003)
Related: Republican Senator: Bush Administration's Stonewalling on Patriot Act is Like "Big Black Hole" (10/14/2003)

5. Clean air, clean water, trees, and other junk from Mother Nature - who needs it? I mean what we really need is cheap oil, more extensive suburbs in the desert, snowmobiles in Yellowstone, some mercury in our air, and a little cyanide in our water.
Administration Behind Weakening of Mercury Standards in Clear Skies Bill (11/12/2003)
Related: "Clean Coal" Trumps Energy Efficiency in Bush-Supported Energy Plan (11/20/2003)
Related: Ads Promoted Bush's "Clear Skies" to Hispanics But Did Not Disclose Extra Risk for Hispanics (10/20/2003)
Related: President Bush Undermines Clean Air Act with New Source Review Decision (9/17/2003)

6. Why should the government do anything when our corporate friends are so much better at robbing the nation blind?
Halliburton Announces Record Profits While Administration Continues to Rebuff Congressional Oversight (10/31/2003)
Related: Halliburton Contract Extension Canceled Amid Allegations of Overcharging Taxpayers (11/6/2003)
Related: Funding for National Parks Is Diverted to Pay for Privatization (10/30/2003)
Related: Bush's Medicare Plan Seeks to Move Seniors into Private Plans, Doesn't Decrease Prescription Drug Costs (10/29/2003)
Related: Internal Email Reveals Halliburton's Strategy to Combat Accusations of Overcharging the Government (10/24/2003)
Related: With U. S. Troops Still in Mideast, Private Firms Must Guard Military Bases at Home (10/22/2003)

7. Everyone needs a good dose of voodoo economics now and then, right? Even though we have the highest job loss rate since the Great Depression, and giant bills from the endless War on Terror, let's give a massive tax cut to people and corporations who need the money the least. CEO's everywhere are buying Hummers for their children for which your children will pay.
Tax Cuts Lead to Largest Deficit Ever in Complete Reversal of Bush's Prediction (9/30/2003)
Related: President Bush's Tax Cuts Still Not Delivering Jobs as Promised (10/3/2003)
Related: New Push for Corporate Tax Cuts Gives Special Treatment to Multinationals (10/28/2003)
Related: Job Losses at Level of Great Depression Contradict President Bush's Wishful Predictions (9/29/2003)

9. Leaving every child behind, this year and every year.
This Week, Bush Gives Lipservice - Not Funding - To America's Schools (1/7/2004)
Related: Bush Tried to Take Funds from Military School Kids to Pay for Iraqi-Afghan Policies (10/13/2003)
Related: First Lady Promotes Reading but President Leaves Education Dept. Behind (10/7/2003)

10. Dissenters beware - we may feed you to the enemy.
President Bush Presents Two-Faced Reaction to National Security Leaks (10/9/2003)

Tuesday, January 06, 2004

The End of the End

Linton Weeks wrote an interesting article this week, The Populist Manifesto, about the tension between so-called high literature and pop fiction (as embodied in the speeches of Stephen King and Shirley Hazzard at the National Book Awards). The notion that always surprises me about these articles is the "apocalypse of culture" tone. The sentiments like, "My society is going to be the one in which great novels die" or "My generation marks the end of the English language" or even "Where have all the good authors gone?" are, to me, a supreme form of egoism. But at the end of the article, the author does take note of similar historical patterns of contemporary popularity versus greatness in literature, almost seeming to nod toward the old cliche that the more things change, the more they stay the same. Still, given his concluding quote, you have to think he really believes that our time is different - our time, more than any other time, has buried the magnificence of writing under best seller lists and sales, and that magnificence is never to be regained.

While one might get away with cries of doomsday when speaking about rogue nations with nukes or the state of our global environment, our culture is fairly safe from some sort of middle-brow devastation. If anything, one might say that given the plethora of fiction, movies, novels, poems, paintings, and so on, the real loser is not the arts parton or society in general, but the artist, who must have not just talent, but also luck, business savvy, connections, and so on. The question remains, even in this case, has it ever been different? Velasquez struggled his entire career to be recognized by the court, no doubt because there were plenty of guys out there who would and could paint the little Spanish princess (rather than toil in the fields or serve in the army). Surely there are thousands of most excellent novels and cultural whatnot rotting in basements or steamer trunks because their creators never could get their feet in the doors of agents, or the works came out the same years as others by the same titles.

At the end of reading these kinds of articles, I always come to the same conclusion - that life is mostly unfair to individual artists, but that society as a whole does not appear to suffer unduly from this unfairness. From a macrosocial vantage point, more is more. We have more mediocre or pulpy books perhaps, as we have more people, more readers, and many more authors than we have ever had (in many more languages). If pulpy books start to win prestigious literary awards, then the literariti will no longer consider those awards significant and will turn to other awards to help them filter out their likes from dislikes. Even if there were no awards for remarkable writing, this could hardly signal the end of remarkable writing, only the end of awards as a good device for cherry picking - a scenario that, although difficult to imagine (since the plethora of awards is nearly as large as the plethora of human activity), is not entirely unpleasant.